|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 9, 2009 8:50:33 GMT -5
I'm not sure if it counts as a horror but my favourite series is the saw franchise. Never got past the third.... so did the dying old man ever die? lol |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Mar 9, 2009 8:52:40 GMT -5
I'm not sure if it counts as a horror but my favourite series is the saw franchise. Never got past the third.... so did the dying old man ever die? lol I still have to see 4 and 5 |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 9, 2009 9:01:38 GMT -5
Never got past the third.... so did the dying old man ever die? lol I still have to see 4 and 5 I worded that poorly, I meant, I only saw the first 3. |
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 9, 2009 9:03:07 GMT -5
I still need 2 see 5. And yeh Jigsaw is dead.
|
|
|
|
Post by bbsy2 on Mar 9, 2009 9:05:40 GMT -5
So uh... when did he die and how and how is there a fifth?
LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 9, 2009 10:05:55 GMT -5
he died in the 3rd wen jeff attacked him wiv a buzzsaw i think it was. And the 4th is set at the same time as the 3rd. The 5th is set just after the 4th, with Hoffman continuing Jigsaw's work.
|
|
|
|
Post by bbsy2 on Mar 9, 2009 10:50:12 GMT -5
Who in the hell is Hoffman?
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 9, 2009 11:58:18 GMT -5
He's the last remaining detective.
|
|
|
|
Post by Synyster Gates on Mar 9, 2009 12:02:33 GMT -5
By God, Nick bullet has come to NHB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 9, 2009 12:04:46 GMT -5
Nick Bullet is no more. And NHB is alot better than the RIW Board.
|
|
|
|
Post by Synyster Gates on Mar 9, 2009 12:21:45 GMT -5
You shall always be Nick Bullet, regardless of what you say, but yea this place is a hell of a lot better.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 9, 2009 12:22:32 GMT -5
yeh i suppose deep down i will always be Nick Bullet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Synyster Gates on Mar 9, 2009 15:10:16 GMT -5
YAY! You fill me with happyness my sweet walrus.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 4:48:19 GMT -5
I watched Saw 5 last night. The traps sucked and I saw the twist coming from the start.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 5:38:45 GMT -5
So it's kind of like Saw 3? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Mar 12, 2009 6:54:59 GMT -5
I watched Saw 5 last night. The traps sucked and I saw the twist coming from the start. well, I hate to say it, but its almost a given that by the time you get to 5, especially 5 in such a short period of time, its going to suck at some point. |
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 8:04:55 GMT -5
i still liked it but it could have been better. can't wait for Saw 6 though which hopefully will be the last.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 8:33:31 GMT -5
6?
Should I even watch the fourth? lol!
I just think all the sequels crapped on what was a great story in part one.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 8:37:25 GMT -5
i recomend watching 4 and 5. I loved 4. And i'm re-watching 5 on saturday. So my opinion will most likely change then.
Best To Worse:
4
2
3
5
1
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 8:44:33 GMT -5
The one I thought was the best, you thought was he worst? Seems we like different things, lol! But in case I got nothing better to do and am in the mood to see people die (and that is a lot of the time... everyone is like that! I just admit it....  ), I'll watch them. Out of curiosity, what is it about the last two that you like the most and like the least about part one? |
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 8:49:48 GMT -5
I guess i just don't like the first one because it wasn't fast enough it seemed alot slower than the others. Saw 4 had me trying to guess the twist the whole way through and it was the first one to do that since Saw 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 8:53:51 GMT -5
Oh, ok. Saw two was pretty damn good, still not as good as the first in my opinion though.
3 was just kind of there, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 8:57:48 GMT -5
3 could have been alot better but it also could have been alot worse. It's basically the one that people forget about.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 9:02:09 GMT -5
3 could have been alot better but it also could have been alot worse. It's basically the one that people forget about. Like Scott Steiner! LOL, J/K. I will check out the rest though. |
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 12, 2009 9:05:15 GMT -5
I actually chuckled at that. And i'm not the sort of fan that would complete suck up 2 him. When i was a Cena fan i still said he couldn't wrestle. But yeah check 4 and 5 out.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Mar 12, 2009 9:12:52 GMT -5
I do remeber some of his earlier work before he came a steroid freak, I think he was way better than, though he did add a few cool suplexes in with the change of character (and muscle mass). The Steiner Recliner would suck even more for the person if he combined it with a full nelson.
and I will, especially 4 since you claim it's so good, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mutant Crouch on Mar 13, 2009 2:43:08 GMT -5
I fell asleep during the 4th three different times and then gave up on it. I think two is the best, even if the first does have the amazingly awesome Cary Elwes.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 13, 2009 7:09:33 GMT -5
if i've got nothing better 2 do this weekend i'm gonna hav a Saw-athon 1,2,3,4,5 in order no breaks.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetarrynator on Mar 15, 2009 12:18:54 GMT -5
3 was worse. 1 i liked better this time round.
|
|
|
|
Post by moneyinthebank on Mar 20, 2009 23:16:43 GMT -5
Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street.
|
|
