|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 19:43:01 GMT -5
The haters...they are so stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 19:56:10 GMT -5
Of course nerd fights on the top 250 in the end just mess up the top 250. Even now I must admit I have fallen into the trap of ratings things 1 or 10 depending on whether or not the movie's current rating is above or below that actual rating I would give it. I feel so dirty lol! edit: I only ever gave the two BloodRayne movies and The Terminator low ratings...but they deserve it. |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 20:11:49 GMT -5
The final straw as the Simpsons Movie and the 2007 Transformers movie. 2 garbage pieces of cinema that don't deserve to be anywhere near the top 250. heck there are alot of movies in the top 250 that I don't care for or even hate but I can understand why they are there. They weren't horrible, but nowhere near top 250. |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 20:24:29 GMT -5
I still want to know how not blindly hating T3 leads to loving it in the little minds of T1 fans. Cameron didn't direct it, who the fuck cares?
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 20:30:31 GMT -5
I still want to know how not blindly hating T3 leads to loving it in the little minds of T1 fans. Cameron didn't direct it, who the fuck cares? If you love T3 so much why don't you just marry it!! Bah Terminator 3 wasn't that bad its just not on par with the other 2. I'm just not above turning it into a cheap running gag. This is no time for jokes damn it! I am actually curious about this. |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 9, 2008 20:47:28 GMT -5
Well, that's different, lol!
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 11, 2008 8:32:32 GMT -5
I get up early, the sky is red damnit!
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 11, 2008 14:17:16 GMT -5
Screw Nintendo, they never released a Digger T. Rock sequel.
bubsy, the reason people bash your T1 bashing is because your arguments against it are also aplicable to the sequels.
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 13, 2008 2:25:00 GMT -5
Well yes, there is that.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 13, 2008 10:10:48 GMT -5
Screw Nintendo, they never released a Digger T. Rock sequel. bubsy, the reason people bash your T1 bashing is because your arguments against it are also aplicable to the sequels. What Horrible mistakes were made by anyone in the sequels? Name just one character in either T2 or T3 that made as many mistakes as the Terminator did in T1 or Reese. The only good choice the Terminator made was wanting to kill Sara, I mean some kid dumped ice cream in her pocket and her boyfriend is an asshole, her life is complete garbage! Euthanizing her is the best thing for Sara. |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 13, 2008 10:20:17 GMT -5
True. How is that an error though?
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 13, 2008 12:58:14 GMT -5
? ok....uh I guess?
I still can't believe not one of the T1 fans have a problem with a machine that is supposed to fit in with humans being so bad at it. Shit even the T-1000 was successful in that department.
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 13, 2008 15:27:39 GMT -5
It was their first shot at trying to convince normal people, of course they had trouble.
So Sarah in T2 was perfectly rational? Her 'covert'escape involving stopping to bash everyone or trying to poison them. Trusting a killer robot identical to the original killer robot just because, driving back to town despite the T-1000 and massive police hunt?
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 14, 2008 10:03:56 GMT -5
It was their first shot at trying to convince normal people, of course they had trouble. So Sarah in T2 was perfectly rational? Her 'covert'escape involving stopping to bash everyone or trying to poison them. Trusting a killer robot identical to the original killer robot just because, driving back to town despite the T-1000 and massive police hunt? Seems like the 600 model was way better at it, you need a better excuse than that. She never fully trusted the robot and only went along because John was there, if it was sent to kill John it would have done so. |
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 14, 2008 14:24:57 GMT -5
Strung-out survivors of a nuclera holocaust, who only sleep 30 minutes a day?
How hard can it be to trick them?
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 15, 2008 11:27:52 GMT -5
Not very, all you need is a blanket. TYhat doesn't alter the fact that the 600 was better at being human than the 800.
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 15, 2008 13:42:22 GMT -5
All they did, all day was walk around in dirty clothes, carrying weapons. Not a hard routine to mimic.
This became a very disjointed conversation with all those deleted posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 16, 2008 11:16:44 GMT -5
yes, thank your buddy.
As far as your comments on the movie, how hard is it to mimic the people around you when all are acting in the same oblivious manner? How many people did you see walking around like they wanted to kill others? How many punching car windsheilds? Shooting people in broad daylight? I'm fairly certain I never saw someone start a car by ripping out the ignition.
|
|
|
|
Post by canedust on Oct 16, 2008 14:29:29 GMT -5
And was anyone around at the time?
As opposed to a leather-clad flower delivery guy, trawling the mall in the second movie.
It's L.A, 1984. Everyone's doped to the eyeballs on narcotics.
The biggest hole in the series? How T2 is 7 years later, yet John's a teenager.
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Oct 17, 2008 7:16:51 GMT -5
T2 is set in 94 not 91. He should be 9, though for the history of his life that was presented, a teenager of at least 13 was a better choice for his age. He wasn't a flower delivery guy, e was just a guy holding a box of flowers, he could have bought them for a sweet heart.
|
|
|
|
Post by moneyinthebank on Mar 20, 2009 22:58:20 GMT -5
Haven't seen it, is it any good ?
|
|
