|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on May 20, 2009 21:18:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on May 20, 2009 21:22:03 GMT -5
We're number 1, we're number one!
oh wait...
|
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on May 20, 2009 21:51:50 GMT -5
Yeah take that Mexico!  Over 1000 cases still only 80 deaths. This super flu is a bit of a wuss even compared to your regular flu strains |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on May 20, 2009 22:06:07 GMT -5
haven't heard anything else about it in forever, lol!
|
|
|
|
Post by snitsky1214 on May 29, 2009 18:54:59 GMT -5
Yeah take that Mexico! Over 1000 cases still only 80 deaths. This super flu is a bit of a wuss even compared to your regular flu strains Well they're say that's how the 1918 flu started out. |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on May 29, 2009 19:00:55 GMT -5
Yeah take that Mexico! Over 1000 cases still only 80 deaths. This super flu is a bit of a wuss even compared to your regular flu strains Well they're say that's how the 1918 flu started out. Yes, cause of cycles, it died off in the spring/summer and rebounded in the Fall/Winter. \ |
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on May 29, 2009 21:18:36 GMT -5
Yeah take that Mexico! Over 1000 cases still only 80 deaths. This super flu is a bit of a wuss even compared to your regular flu strains Well they're say that's how the 1918 flu started out. Oh yeah the 1918 flu that started in 1917 They probably said the same thing about SARS too |
|
Over 1000 cases still only 80 deaths. This super flu is a bit of a wuss even compared to your regular flu strains