|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 21, 2009 13:29:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by moneyinthebank on Jul 21, 2009 13:43:09 GMT -5
A 9 y.o. would be distracted by a nipple ?
|
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 21, 2009 13:51:51 GMT -5
A 9 y.o. would be distracted by a nipple ? The was this little incident at a local sporting event called the Super Bowl and after that we learnt that one nipple was capable of almost destroying the United States. So it wouldn''t be so much as a 9 yr old being distracted but rather his immortal soul might forever be in jeopardy, the dead will rise and Satan shall walk the Earth. Everyone else would be too emotionally traumatized to do anything about it. |
|
|
|
Post by moneyinthebank on Jul 21, 2009 14:07:56 GMT -5
A 9 y.o. would be distracted by a nipple ? The was this little incident at a local sporting event called the Super Bowl and after that we learnt that one nipple was capable of almost destroying the United States. So it wouldn''t be so much as a 9 yr old being distracted but rather his immortal soul might forever be in jeopardy, the dead will rise and Satan shall walk the Earth. Everyone else would be too emotionally traumatized to do anything about it. Oh cool ! |
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 21, 2009 14:11:27 GMT -5
The was this little incident at a local sporting event called the Super Bowl and after that we learnt that one nipple was capable of almost destroying the United States. So it wouldn''t be so much as a 9 yr old being distracted but rather his immortal soul might forever be in jeopardy, the dead will rise and Satan shall walk the Earth. Everyone else would be too emotionally traumatized to do anything about it. Oh cool ! More sad really but thanks for chiming in with your 2 cents. Had anyone quizzed me prior to seeing this article I would have guessed people had to be at least 18-21 before they could start running around with guns |
|
|
|
Post by THE Man They Call Uberto on Jul 21, 2009 14:48:44 GMT -5
Fucking texas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mutant Crouch on Jul 21, 2009 15:03:35 GMT -5
More sad really but thanks for chiming in with your 2 cents. Had anyone quizzed me prior to seeing this article I would have guessed people had to be at least 18-21 before they could start running around with guns It's weird and actually quite stupid. Here you can hunt alone if you're 16 or older, but cannot purchase a long gun until 18. As for concealed guns it's 21 to purchase with at least 12 hours in a safety and training course. It should be 21 all around. You can't even trust 9 year olds not to injure themselves with a BB gun. Letting them run off to shoot at living creatures with a real one is insane. |
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Phantasm on Jul 21, 2009 23:09:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 22, 2009 6:42:26 GMT -5
More sad really but thanks for chiming in with your 2 cents. Had anyone quizzed me prior to seeing this article I would have guessed people had to be at least 18-21 before they could start running around with guns It's weird and actually quite stupid. Here you can hunt alone if you're 16 or older, but cannot purchase a long gun until 18. As for concealed guns it's 21 to purchase with at least 12 hours in a safety and training course. It should be 21 all around. You can't even trust 9 year olds not to injure themselves with a BB gun. Letting them run off to shoot at living creatures with a real one is insane. Sadly I doubt Common Sense vs The US Constitution would have a happy ending. Heck the NRA protested any government action to make 'cop killer' bullets illegal. |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 22, 2009 19:00:24 GMT -5
A 9 y.o. would be distracted by a nipple ? The was this little incident at a local sporting event called the Super Bowl and after that we learnt that one nipple was capable of almost destroying the United States. So it wouldn''t be so much as a 9 yr old being distracted but rather his immortal soul might forever be in jeopardy, the dead will rise and Satan shall walk the Earth. Everyone else would be too emotionally traumatized to do anything about it. dear god, who could forget that...  |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 22, 2009 19:14:29 GMT -5
The was this little incident at a local sporting event called the Super Bowl and after that we learnt that one nipple was capable of almost destroying the United States. So it wouldn''t be so much as a 9 yr old being distracted but rather his immortal soul might forever be in jeopardy, the dead will rise and Satan shall walk the Earth. Everyone else would be too emotionally traumatized to do anything about it. dear god, who could forget that... right here... that crap wasn't worth my time at all.... |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 22, 2009 19:18:39 GMT -5
dear god, who could forget that... right here... that crap wasn't worth my time at all.... it was embarrassing that so many people in America were upset over a quick nip slip... |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 22, 2009 19:35:28 GMT -5
right here... that crap wasn't worth my time at all.... it was embarrassing that so many people in America were upset over a quick nip slip... Actually, that event is what made me wish I was allowed to kill all the stupid people, personally I found the performance more offensive than the nipple. |
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 24, 2009 8:34:27 GMT -5
it was embarrassing that so many people in America were upset over a quick nip slip... Actually, that event is what made me wish I was allowed to kill all the stupid people, personally I found the performance more offensive than the nipple. The hysteria was really what was offensive, and you had gone on a killing spree you probably would have done the world a favour |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 24, 2009 14:59:10 GMT -5
Actually, that event is what made me wish I was allowed to kill all the stupid people, personally I found the performance more offensive than the nipple. The hysteria was really what was offensive, and you had gone on a killing spree you probably would have done the world a favour  |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 25, 2009 20:04:02 GMT -5
More sad really but thanks for chiming in with your 2 cents. Had anyone quizzed me prior to seeing this article I would have guessed people had to be at least 18-21 before they could start running around with guns no, no, its much younger unfortunately... |
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 26, 2009 12:18:08 GMT -5
More sad really but thanks for chiming in with your 2 cents. Had anyone quizzed me prior to seeing this article I would have guessed people had to be at least 18-21 before they could start running around with guns no, no, its much younger unfortunately... Well stupid angry kids with free access to unsupervised use of firearms has never caused any problems in the past |
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Phantasm on Jul 26, 2009 17:55:58 GMT -5
What a shame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 27, 2009 19:25:21 GMT -5
no, no, its much younger unfortunately... Well stupid angry kids with free access to unsupervised use of firearms has never caused any problems in the past They didn't?  |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 27, 2009 19:34:09 GMT -5
Well stupid angry kids with free access to unsupervised use of firearms has never caused any problems in the past They didn't? that's what you call being a smart ass.  |
|
|
|
Post by hypercringe on Jul 28, 2009 8:47:25 GMT -5
Its the music these kids listen to these days!
Lets lynch Miley Cyrus!
|
|
