|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jun 23, 2010 13:50:18 GMT -5
This is going to be bad I feel. I don't see it being used for the right reasons and see a lot of lawsuits (insert sad face as I'm doing this as a quick reply)
|
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 1, 2010 12:09:52 GMT -5
I protest this for one simple reason, it is wrong to do that to a penis!
|
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 1, 2010 22:32:59 GMT -5
I protest this for one simple reason, it is wrong to do that to a penis! really? would it be wrong to do that to a child molesters dick? I don't think so! |
|
|
|
Post by b_Pooly on Jul 2, 2010 6:36:17 GMT -5
I protest this for one simple reason, it is wrong to do that to a penis! really? would it be wrong to do that to a child molesters dick? I don't think so! Isn't "just shoot them in the head" always my answer? Why would you state that as a question? LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 8, 2010 19:21:42 GMT -5
I'm rather surprised Matt didn't post here!
|
|
|
|
Post by BigFaker on Jul 9, 2010 4:31:05 GMT -5
I'm rather surprised Matt didn't post here! Just seen this, I'll have to read the article |
|
|
|
Post by BigFaker on Jul 9, 2010 5:10:34 GMT -5
Right, I've read this now and I'm pretty shocked something like this could even make it past the ideas stage. No wonder she had to sell her house to fund it, nobody would touch this with a bargepole.
The thought is a good one in principle, but that contraption is flawed in so many ways. The potential for misuse is high and I don't think it'd be used on just rapists, there's a lot of sadistic people out there.
Plus the onus would be on the wearer, who I'd assume would have to predict whether they'll be raped or not, which would automatically put you in a negative mindset
In short, it's not ethical. And she comes off as a few sandwiches short of a picnic too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Queen of the Damned on Jul 9, 2010 12:05:17 GMT -5
Right, I've read this now and I'm pretty shocked something like this could even make it past the ideas stage. No wonder she had to sell her house to fund it, nobody would touch this with a bargepole. The thought is a good one in principle, but that contraption is flawed in so many ways. The potential for misuse is high and I don't think it'd be used on just rapists, there's a lot of sadistic people out there. Plus the onus would be on the wearer, who I'd assume would have to predict whether they'll be raped or not, which would automatically put you in a negative mindset In short, it's not ethical. And she comes off as a few sandwiches short of a picnic too. exactly! I find it scary personally, as someone said, "what if the chick was drunk and forgot?" |
|
|
|
Post by THE Man They Call Uberto on Jul 14, 2010 23:50:20 GMT -5
That's fucking cool. I hope these become all the rage. Now when the shit latches onto the dude isn't he just going to be stuck inside the girl. What if he goes soft, or isn't big enough? What if he wants to rape her anally or orally? So many questions unanswered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mutant Crouch on Jul 15, 2010 3:57:21 GMT -5
I'd really rather them work on a solution that would prevent it before the guy could get that far. Not that rape whistles aren't 100% effective.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE Man They Call Uberto on Jul 15, 2010 19:07:44 GMT -5
Dude rape whistles are 100% innefective. When I hear a whistle the first thing that comes to my mind is not oh shit somebodies getting raped. Basically the only thing to prevent a rape from getting that far is a gun. It sucks though, you'll have to wear it everyday. Cause think about it what if you wore it everyday but one day you didn't have it on and you got raped. All that wasted money for nothing. I think rapist should meet up with yamaguchi san. Speaking of yamaguchi san his "wife" was hot. DAMN!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mutant Crouch on Jul 15, 2010 23:31:36 GMT -5
Have you ever witnessed a rape whistle failing?
|
|
